The final over: how India pulled off the heist

Bangladesh needed 11 off the final over. It ended in heartbreak for them

ESPNcricinfo staff23-Mar-201619.1 Pandya to Mahmudullah, 1 run, goes full and wide, steered to deep cover
19.2 Pandya to Mushfiqur Rahim, FOUR, slower ball goes wrong – it is short of a length and wide outside off – Mushy smacks it through extra cover! That’s a top shot, and he went so deep in the crease!19.3 Pandya to Mushfiqur Rahim, FOUR, fist pumps, bat swinging, yells! Mushy wanders outside off and scoops it away. Past Dhoni. It was not timed properly. Just one of those shots that just had enough bat to fit in the gap. But fine leg was up and the plan was sound19.4 Pandya to Mushfiqur Rahim, OUT, he’s caught at deep midwicket, did they cross, with Mahmudullah be on strike? The slower ball, the short ball, the pull shot and without the pace it comes straight down Dhawan’s throatMushfiqur Rahim c Dhawan b Pandya 11 (15m 6b 2×4 0x6) SR: 183.3319.5 Pandya to Mahmudullah, OUT, and its Jaddu again! The man who was moved from cover, their best fielder was positioned there by Dhoni and he comes into the play immediately because Mahmudullah went for a slog off a full toss! Jadeja ran in, then to his right and took the catch reverse cup! Pressure catch. And now its two off one Mahmudullah c Jadeja b Pandya 18 (48m 22b 1×4 0x6) SR: 81.81 19.6 Pandya to Shuvagata Hom, OUT, have they run the bye? Third umpire called into play. Dhoni did not throw. He ran up to break the stumps. How fast is the cutter man? Mustafizur is out! India win! India keep their campaign alive and look at those celebrations. Kohli exults wildly. Pandya is out of breath. He is hunched over his knees after defending only 10 runs! It was a short ball outside off, wide outside off, Shuvagata can’t reach it. and Bangladesh have fallen agonisingly shortMustafizur Rahman run out 0 (2m 0b 0x4 0x6) SR: –

Pant's maiden IPL fifty steers Daredevils home

ESPNcricinfo staff03-May-2016Shahbaz Nadeem’s double-strike in the fourth over sent Smith and Aaron Finch packing, leaving Lions on 24 for 3•BCCISuresh Raina chipped in with 24 and added 51 for the fourth wicket with Dinesh Karthik as the pair tried to rebuild•BCCIKarthik then added 52 for the fifth wicket with Ravindra Jadeja and reached his half-century off 42 balls•AFPJadeja had a reprieve as Nadeem put down a difficult chance at midwicket when the batsman was on 22•BCCIKarthik fell soon after, for 53, castled by Mohammed Shami. Lions were on 127 for 5 with 15 balls to go•BCCIJadeja applied the finishing touches, and his unbeaten 36 off 26 balls lifted Lions to 149 for 7•BCCIDaredevils’ bowlers hunted in a pack. Zaheer Khan led from the front, picking up 1 for 27 in four overs•BCCIDaredevils’ openers, Quinton de Kock and Rishabh Pant, got the team off to a flyer, blazing away to 115 in 13.3 overs•BCCIPant, picked in place of Shreyas Iyer, made his chance count and biffed 69 off 40 balls, his maiden fifty in limited-overs cricket•AFPJadeja broke the stand by dismissing Pant and de Kock fell to a slog off Shivil Kaushik with Daredevils 29 away from a win•BCCIEven with Daredevils just eight away from a win, McCullum was as committed and acrobatic as ever•BCCIBut JP Duminy and Sanju Samson avoided further hiccups, sealing the eight-wicket win in 17.2 overs•BCCI

The bat-first disadvantage at Edgbaston

Stats preview of the Edgbaston Test, where teams batting first have had the odds stacked against them in recent times

Shiva Jayaraman02-Aug-20166-1 England’s win-loss record at Edgbaston in their last ten Tests. Their only loss in that time came against South Africa in 2008. Among venues at home that have hosted at least five Tests since 2006, England have a better record only at Old Trafford.4-0 England’s win-loss record against Pakistan at Edgbaston. It is the only home venue where England haven’t lost a Test to Pakistan from five or more matches and one of only two home venues – the other being Trent Bridge – where they have an unbeaten record against Pakistan. The last time the hosts played Pakistan at Edgbaston, in 2010, they won by nine wickets after dismissing them for just 72 in the first innings.22.42 Batting average of top order (No. 1 to No. 7) batsmen in the first innings of Tests at Edgbaston since 2006 – the worst among 64 venues that have hosted more than one Test in this period. The only first-innings hundred at this venue in the last ten years was hit by Denesh Ramdin in the rain-affected draw in 2012.15.04 Average runs made for each wicket lost in the morning session of the first day’s play in Tests at Edgbaston since 2006 – the worst at any Test venue in this period. A wicket falls every 34 balls in the morning session on the first day here, which is also the highest rate at any venue in Tests since 2006. The last time Pakistan played at this venue, they lost six wickets in the first session.

Worst venues for batting, opening session of Tests since 2006
Venue Sessions Wkts Runs/Wkt Balls/Wkt
Edgbaston 5 22 15.04 34.04
Pallekele 5 16 23.18 47.62
P Sara Oval 10 37 23.21 40.78
Kandy 3 9 23.66 41.33
Napier 4 13 24.15 48.00

2005 The last time the team batting first won a Test at Edgbaston. England beat Australia by two runs in that famous Test, after posting a total of 407 in just 79.2 overs on the first day. Since then though, no team has won batting first in seven Tests at this venue and has lost five of them. On the two occasions when teams batting first did manage a draw, the Tests were affected by rain. At least three full days of play were lost in the Test involving West Indies in 2012, while the Ashes Tests that was drawn here in 2009 saw only 276.3 overs bowled in the entire match.29.24 Fast bowlers’ average at Edgbaston in Tests since 2006 – the second best at any venue in England. Only Trent Bridge, with an average of 26.20, has played better for them. Edgbaston is favourable to pace bowlers, especially of the first day of Tests: among venues in any country that have hosted at least two Tests in the last ten years, an average of 24.35 for quicks on the first day is the best.

Best venues for pacers on 1st day of Tests, since 2006 (min 2 Tests)
Venue Days Wkts Runs/Wkt Balls/Wkt
Edgbaston 6 53 24.35 44.05
Dominica 4 20 26.20 58.20
RPS, Colombo 2 9 26.33 58.22
Trent Bridge 9 76 26.42 48.93
Pallekele 5 27 27.29 51.51

.9 Wickets Chris Woakes took in an innings the last time he bowled in a first-class game at his home venue. Woakes returned to the England XI to replace the injured Ben Stokes for the second Test against Sri Lanka after he returned figures of 9 for 36 against Durham in May. The other Warwickshire bowlers collectively took 1 for 138 in that innings. Woakes has taken 21 wickets at 13.85 in first-class matches at this venue in 2016. He has already taken 18 wickets – 11 more than any other bowler – at an average of 11.66 from two Tests in this series.98.71 Alex Hales’ batting average in first-class matches at this venue. He has made 691 runs with three hundreds – including scores of 155 not out and 183 – and three fifties in ten innings on this ground. He has, however, made only 56 runs from four innings in the current series and has managed to put up only one fifty stand with Alastair Cook. England haven’t had a century opening stand in their last 11 Tests at home and have averaged 27.27 for their first wicket with a highest partnership of 68.294 The highest individual score in Tests at Edgbaston, made by Cook against India in 2011. Besides that innings though, Cook has managed to score only 208 runs at an average of 23.11 from ten innings and has been dismissed for single-digits in five of his last eight innings at Edgbaston.19.39 Runs Pakistan’s top-order batsmen (No. 1 to No. 7) other than Misbah-ul-Haq and and Asad Shafiq have averaged in this series. They have together scored 349 runs with a highest of 45 from 18 innings. Misbah and Shafiq have made 366 runs at an average of 45.75 with one hundred and two fifties.

Pakistan’s top-order batsmen in this series
Batsmen Inns Runs Ave 100s/50s
Misbah-ul-Haq and Asad Shafiq 8 366 45.75 1/2
Other top-order batsmen 18 349 19.39 0/0

'Pakistan never found another Hanif'

Reactions and tributes on the passing of Pakistan legend Hanif Mohammad

ESPNcricinfo staff11-Aug-2016The cricket world paid tribute to Pakistan legend Hanif Mohammad, who died aged 81 in Karachi.

'Getting Sri Lanka back on track is a long, slow process'

Graham Ford, the team’s coach, wants the island’s special brand of cricket firing through his young team again

Interview by Andrew Fidel Fernando07-Jun-2016What drew you back to Sri Lanka?
I’ve talked about how I’d thoroughly enjoyed the first stint. I enjoy the players’ attitude and a lot of their approach to the game. Though I moved away from Sri Lanka, they were pretty much my team as far as the international competition went. I was supporting Sri Lanka, following them, and staying in touch with quite a few of the boys.Going back to coach Sri Lanka was something I had to think long and hard about because I was really enjoying what was going on at Surrey. But in the end – weighing all sorts of things up – I decided that at this stage of my career it would be nice to take on a huge challenge, in that there’s a lot of improvement that’s required. But I think good things can be achieved with the kind of attitudes and the kinds of people that I work with.Has anything surprised you during the second stint? What has stayed the same and what has changed?
Quite a lot has changed. In the last stint the senior players helped the youngsters along and set the tone in the matches. Now suddenly the young players have to make their own momentum. As you get older in your coaching career, you realise that you have to adapt your coaching style to the group that you’ve got.There is a general understanding that there is quite a lot of work to be done, and there is a decent amount of patience, which is very important.What sorts of changes have you made to your coaching style with this team?
When you have senior players, you’re more of a facilitator – more of a behind-the-scenes-type supporter. When it’s a younger group, you’ve got to be more out in front. More instruction is required. There’s more involvement in the decision-making as to how the game is going to be played.

“If Chameera can get some lateral movement in the air at that pace, then he becomes something really, really special”

Your senior players know their game and what they need to work on. They might just ask you to monitor one or two things to make sure they’re in place. You are more guided by the player, whereas with a younger player, you have to let them know the important areas they have to work on, and sometimes insist that they do have to work on certain areas.Do you find younger players come to you with areas they personally want to work on?
I’ve tried to encourage a really good work culture. And it was one of the first things we had to establish. I feel they are getting towards where we want to be. If we’re going to close the gap on some of these teams, we have to work harder than the other teams simply because of where we’re at. The boys are starting to get on with the work on their own and also starting to ask for opportunities to work on certain areas they know they need to improve on.You wanted the job till 2019. Is that a reflection the fact that this team had a long way to go?
It was pretty clear to everybody that we spoke to that it wasn’t going to be a quick fix. It was something that needed to be built on a solid foundation. It’s quite a long, slow process. If it’s done properly, then hopefully it stays strong for a long time.Do you buy into the idea of the “Sri Lankan brand of cricket”?
You’ve always got to keep a good eye on the simple basics, but after that, if you want to get the edge, doing something different, playing with flair and taking the attack to the opposition are all things Sri Lanka has used.Sri Lankan players don’t play according to the coaching manual, but they find something different and effective. A lot of people around the world have always enjoyed Sri Lanka because it’s a small island with a small population and a small budget, yet they’ve always been able to go toe to toe with the big guns. They’ve been brave even when opposition has been bigger, taller and more imposing. I think that’s what Sri Lanka is all about, and we need to get that all firing again.” Sri Lankan players don’t play according to the coaching manual, but they find something different and effective. It’s a small island with a small population and a small budget, yet they’ve always been able to go toe to toe with the big guns”•Getty ImagesWhat discipline requires the most improvement?
I’m not sure we’re at a stage where we actually know who our best players are. That also takes some time because you need to give players a decent run and find out a bit about them. We have got a good amount of cricket ahead of us, so after a 12-month period we’ll have a good idea of who has the technique and the mental strength for a long run in international cricket. Or if they don’t cut it, we’ve got to go elsewhere – but we’ll know for sure that that player’s not up to it.I think [chief selector] Sanath Jayasuriya has been brilliant with that process. He’s really trying to explore talent as quickly as possible with lots of trial matches and things. But those only take you so far, because there’s quite a step up from a trial match to an international.In terms of which areas require attention – it’s pretty clear we need to improve all of them. We need more allrounders, because we have a long tail, always. We don’t have seam-bowling allrounders in particular. We need to develop a solid top order, where there is a lot of talent. We also need to find some good pace – someone to partner Dushmantha Chameera. We need to find depth in the fast-bowling unit as well, to account for injuries. There are also some talented young spin bowlers, but when Rangana Herath finally stops, we haven’t got what we’ve had for so long with Muttiah Muralitharan and Rangana. There are a few spinners who could get there, but they need some time to develop.Chameera is someone a lot of coaches are excited by. What does he need to work on to realise his potential?
He is a brilliant athlete. I remember seeing him bowl as a net bowler down at Galle some years back, and he just kept getting all our guys out. I think that maybe if he can get some lateral movement in the air at that pace, then he becomes something really, really special. On some of the Test match surfaces which are not offering much, you do need to do something in the air.

“After a 12-month period we’ll have a good idea of who has the technique and the mental strength for a long run in international cricket”

The batting has been fragile recently. Is that to do with skill, temperament or something else?
I can’t say exactly what’s causing the problem. If we’re talking about playing in England, quite a number of them have had to make adjustments to their technique, which is a hell of a difficult thing when you’ve played one way all your life. It’s tough to stick to those changes when the adrenaline’s pumping and the ball is whizzing around. You revert to what’s natural to you.Going forward, it seems as though the board’s vision is for the coaching at the emerging and development levels to be really good. Hopefully the necessary technical requirements are well entrenched by the time they get to the national level.Kusal Mendis has made an impact on this tour. What does he have to do to establish himself in the team?
He established himself – he’s got a wonderful technique. He’s one of our guys who’s really got a technique that can survive wherever he goes in world cricket. Whoever has coached him as a young lad has done a magnificent job. He is still learning and needs to get to a stage where he turns his exciting starts into bigger contributions.For such a young guy to be batting at No. 3 in Test cricket is very exciting. Ideally you’d break a young guy like that in at No. 6 and let him bat for a while in a position where the tone is set by the specialists, and the ball is older. But he’s having to be the tone-setter, and he’s shown that he can do it.”Kusal Mendis is one of our guys who’s really got a technique that can survive wherever he goes in world cricket”•Getty ImagesWhat excites you about his technique in particular?
Playing in this country, your shoulder alignment has to be good so that it’s really in line with your eyes. Once you have good shoulder alignment and have the front side working, you can play with a much softer bottom hand, which absorbs the energy of the ball. If you keep pushing hard and there’s a lot of energy with the bottom part of the bat, you end up playing away from your eyes and the nicks fly. Kusal’s got lovely shoulder alignment, great arm work and a lovely soft bottom hand when defending. He always gets his eyes close to the contact point.Over the last couple of years, Sri Lanka have got to good positions in many matches, only to let games slip. Is there a strategic weakness there?
That’s something that you can’t really coach. That’s something that develops over a period of time, as these guys develop. As these guys become tougher and play together more, those sorts of issues will sort themselves out. Patience is important. The board have planted the seeds for growth with certain appointments that they’ve made. Now it’s time to watch it grow.Would you like to see the team be more attacking with their strategy and tactics?
From session to session that could be different. It’s easy to say, “You should be more attacking”, but it also depends on the bowlers and firepower. There are a lot of things to factor in.What are some of Angelo Mathews’ strengths as a captain that we don’t see on the field?
On match day he leads from the front and he’s got a record that shows that. He’s got massive respect from the opposition. It’s always great when your leader has that. He’s also got respect from the young players. He’s also had the benefit of playing with so many really good greats of the past, and he’s been able to share that with the lads, which he’s brilliant at.Would you like to see Kumar Sangakkara and Mahela Jayawardene involved in some way with the side?
They’ve both got so much to offer. They have cricket brains like you can’t believe. It would be sad to see them not getting involved along the way, because they certainly would make a difference.

Australia invite further trials by spin

Halting displays by Australia against the spinning ball in the Caribbean will only encourage more turning tracks when Steven Smith’s men seek to prove their ability to adapt to India next year

Daniel Brettig12-Jun-2016On the face of it, a limited-overs triangular series in the Caribbean would seem to have very little to do with a Test series in India more than eight months away. Yet the itinerary for Australia’s trip to the subcontinent in February 2017 came at a portentous moment for Steven Smith’s team, given they were about to be left red-faced by a trio of South African spinners on a sharply turning Guyana pitch.The choice of Bengaluru, Dharamsala, Ranchi and Pune as host cities for the next instalment of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy meant the Australians will be part of history in each of the last three venues, taking part in the first Test matches to be held at those grounds. Irrespective of that, the events at Providence Stadium likely confirmed that the pitches Australia would face in India would be similar to the tracks of 2013, when savage spin and uneven bounce contributed to a 4-0 drubbing that would have played out even without the unsavoury dramas of “Homeworkgate” in Mohali.That season, as with this one, Australia’s visit was preceded by an England tour to India, and Alastair Cook’s side were able to prevail on a quartet of pitches that seemed far more equitable in character. This was no accident, as proven by the following exchange between an Indian selector and his Australian counterpart towards the end of the series.”We were worried about England’s spinners, so for those games we tried to prepare decent wickets. But we knew your inadequacies against spin, and our spin bowling was better than yours. We knew if we made sure the wickets were extreme you couldn’t beat us.”Whether England can expect the same treatment now that Graeme Swann has retired is one thing, but the ongoing tri-series has all but confirmed that Australian “inadequacies against spin” still remain. The loss to South Africa revived memories of 2013, as a succession of batsmen struggled to find a viable method of survival. Critically, they were unable to see off the vital first few deliveries, when defensive techniques needed to be tight and time had to be spent to read the pace of the pitch, the breadth of spin and the challenge offered by each bowler.The most glaring example of this failing, however, had come in Australia’s opening match. Faced with Sunil Narine’s spin at the closing stage of a relatively comfortable win for the visitors, Glenn Maxwell met his second ball with a firmly planted front foot and a waft through the line as if he were playing on the truest and most Australian of surfaces. Narine breached the yawning gap between bat and pad. The middle stump was disturbed.It was a moment that recalled nothing so much as the scenario Smith has spoken about often, where Australian instincts overrule more cerebral learnings about how to handle such surfaces. “I think you have your plans, but when you get under pressure you get back to what you know and what you’ve learned, what you’ve grown up with,” he had said last year. “So you have to try to get away from that as much as possible to make sure that when you’re under pressure you’re able to do what you’ve practised.”Smith, the interim coach Justin Langer and others have all discussed this adaptation doctrine in the Caribbean, and it will surely be heard again over the Test tour of Sri Lanka in July and then the India trip next year. But words must be backed up with actions and so far in Guyana – at times even during their Saturday victory over South Africa in St Kitts – the battle between instinct and thought seemed to be getting away from the batsmen.One difference from the Australian teams of 2013 and 2016 is a contingent of improved spinners•AFPThis is not to say that Cricket Australia is unaware or uncaring about the problems glimpsed over the past week. On the contrary, the team performance manager, Pat Howard, and the staff at the National Cricket Centre in Brisbane have spent considerable sums trying to create spinning environments for batsmen to learn from. But there are wider forces at work that can detract from any such due diligence.An irony of the cricket schedule in the 21st century is that most top Australian cricketers spend more time in India than any previous generation, but do so while playing on IPL pitches that bear no resemblance to subcontinental Test tracks. Next year’s schedule calls for the touring team to arrive for the first of four Tests in early February and leave in early March – precious little time for an effective warm-up period.Among the men best placed to be ready for a trial by spin are Joe Burns and Adam Voges, who are not with the one-day side in the West Indies. If they are not required for the limited-overs matches at the back end of the home summer either, they may be able to commit to specialised training regimens ahead of the India trip, much as Ed Cowan did three years ago. Another variable will be how long Voges chooses to continue his remarkable Test career – the slow-wicket skill he demonstrated on debut against West Indies in Dominica last year will be highly useful in India. But as Michael Hussey showed at the end of the 2012 Boxing Day Test, it is always possible for a valued player to retire ahead of the team’s expectations.One area of difference for Australia between 2013 and now is a much improved set of spinners. Nathan Lyon is no longer that hesitant figure of three years ago, but Australia’s most prolific Test match offspinner. Steve O’Keefe, chosen for Sri Lanka, is a canny operator and well-traveled cricketer. And most promising of all is the young legspinner Adam Zampa, who, in the words of Brad Haddin, “forces batsmen to make decisions off the stumps” and changes his pace artfully.Zampa has not been chosen for Sri Lanka, but it is not difficult to imagine him on the plane to India next year, provided he can claim a useful haul of wickets for South Australia in the Sheffield Shield back home. He has already enjoyed success in the IPL, on tracks far less helpful than those likely for the Tests. In short, Australia’s retaliatory spin bowling deterrent is stronger than it has been for some years.Nevertheless, events so far in the Caribbean are likely to encourage the preparation of more tinder-dry pitches for the Australians to face when they venture to India in 2017. Short of internal BCCI turf wars that infamously helped in the unveiling of a rare grassy pitch in Nagpur in 2004, the only way Australia can encourage the use of any other sorts of surfaces is to demonstrate the adaptability Smith and others have so ardently advocated. Given that St Kitts and Barbados will not spin like Guyana, they are running out of opportunities to do so.

South Africa aim for the 'head of the snake'

Dale Steyn believes that for his team to win a third successive Test series in Australia, they have to take down captain Steven Smith

Firdose Moonda in Perth30-Oct-20162:19

Attacking the captain key to tripping up Australia – Steyn

Whether Dale Steyn sees the Australian team as a snake or a ship, his intention is to stop them simply by stopping Steven Smith.”If you can cut off the head of the snake, the rest of the body tends to fall,” Steyn said at the series launch in Perth. “We’ve done that in the past. We’ve tried to attack the captain because he is the leader and if we can cause a bit of chaos there, sometimes it does affect the rest of the guys.”Targeting the opposition captain has long been an Australian trick. Mitchell Johnson did it to Graeme Smith. Shane Warne did it to Hansie Cronje and Shaun Pollock. But Steyn has already begun to turn the tables. The batsman he has dismissed the most in world cricket is Michael Clarke – nine times in 14 matches although not all of them when Clarke was captain – and now he has Smith in the firing line as South Africa seek a third successive series win down under.”Aussie captains lead the attack. From history, you look at guys that are great players like Steve Waugh, he stands out. I don’t think many people can name a team underneath him but you remember Steve Waugh,” Steyn said, forgetting Matthew Hayden, Justin Langer, Glenn McGrath and Warne.”You can remember Ricky Ponting, and Michael Clarke and then Steven Smith falls into that bracket. The moment you can get hold of your captain, the rest of the players rely heavily on him. He leads the ship so when you pull the plug on that kind of ship, and he’s holding it, you can sink it. It’s not very easy but there’s a way to sink it.”In 2012, South Africa felled Australia by frustrating Ponting. He was limited to 32 runs in three Tests, his waning powers picked at by everyone. Ponting was dismissed twice by the short ball, twice by the swinging one and finally by Robin Peterson, whom he flattered by playing for turn that was never going to be there.’They are probably a little bit hurt’ – Dale Steyn on Australia after they lost 0-5 to South Africa after losing 0-3 to Sri Lanka•AFPSmith, who has enjoyed some of the best form in world cricket in the last two years, is unlikely to prove as soft. But there are weaknesses in his captaincy as a Test whitewash in Sri Lanka and an ODI whitewash in South Africa might suggest. South Africa are looking to exploit that.”They are probably a little bit hurt after Sri Lanka and especially after coming to South Africa and losing 5-nil,” Steyn said.Although he did not go as far as to say South Africa have a clear edge over Australia, Steyn was comforted by the team’s record at the WACA – unbeaten after three matches – and their extensive preparation.”When it comes to being on top of the Australians, you never quite feel like that. Even if you’ve beaten them for 365 days in a row, come the 1st of January the next year, they are up for it,” he said. “But the mood in the camp is really good. The guys are comfortable, we’ve been here for almost two weeks.”That much preparation is unheard of considering how packed the cricket calendar is. Some might even think Australia have been particularly generous to their opposition, providing two practice matches before the start of the series on November 3. But one of them was to allow South Africa to learn about the pink ball ahead of the day-night Test in Adelaide on November 24. And the other was against an under-strength opposition with most of Australia’s Test specialists playing the first round of the Sheffield Shield.Having spent two weeks, in which time they played two practice matches, ahead of the Tests, South Africa are feeling confident•Getty ImagesNevertheless, it gave South Africa enough time to acclimatise. Batsmen Stephen Cook, Quinton de Kock, Temba Bavuma, both spinners Tabraiz Shamsi and Keshav Maharaj and fast bowler Kagiso Rabada are on their first Test tour of Australia. But Steyn thinks at least one of them is more than ready.Rabada, who debuted against Australia in a T20 series two years ago, is the man Steyn thinks could be the difference between the two sides.”It doesn’t feel like KG has been in this team for a long time but it’s actually almost three years now so he’s learned a lot and he’s an incredible talent,” Steyn said. “He’s always looking to learn and his record is pretty amazing for such a young guy, especially a bowler. You only see bowlers tend to come into their stripes at maybe 26 or 27, especially fast bowlers. I think he’s got about 10 years of experience in three years which is really great. I’m excited to see what he can do because in Adelaide the other night he was bowling really quick and he was landing the ball exactly where he wanted to.”Rabada led South Africa’s attack in Steyn and Vernon Philander’s absence last summer and was one of very few positives in an otherwise disappointing season. But South Africa do not see themselves as a team that has tumbled to No.1 to No.7 (and who have now crawled back up to No.5). They see themselves as a team that has had success in Australia and are using that to spur their youngsters on.”The guys who have never played any cricket here in Australia, who are on their first Test tour, are coming here with a good feeling because the other guys that have been here have done well. Its not that feeling that in the past where we feel like we’ve been donnered (beaten up) and have our tails between our legs. We come here with some good history.”Australia have better history overall though, and Smith will be well aware of that. He will know that successful Australian teams have been successful because their leader was strong and that if he can counter South Africa, his men may be able to do the same.”I think they are going to come hard in terms of cricket. Their bowlers are going to be hitting hard lengths, coming past the nose, their batters are going to be in our face, they are going to be on the front foot, try and show their dominance,” Steyn said. “If we go fist to fist, let’s just see who can fight the longest and then you will find your winner.”

Pujara, Rahane and Henry star on hard-fought day

ESPNcricinfo staff30-Sep-2016New Zealand suffered a massive early blow: Kane Williamson was unwell and had to sit out the match. Ross Taylor, standing in as captain, lost the toss, and India batted•BCCIShikhar Dhawan made India’s playing XI ahead of Gautam Gambhir, in place of the injured KL Rahul. But he did not last long, chopping on off Matt Henry for 1•Associated PressOn a pitch with some bounce and a sprinkling of grass, New Zealand continued to hold sway, but Cheteshwar Pujara was firm at his end, even getting away a fab straight drive•Associated PressHenry was not done yet though: he produced a peach, getting one to angle in and straighten, to have M Vijay edge behind•Associated PressTrent Boult bowled a typically testing spell, and was rewarded with the wicket of Virat Kohli, who was caught off a loose stroke outside off•BCCIJeetan Patel was called into the Test XI for the first time in over three years, and he too kept India in check – he had an edge off Pujara split the keeper and slip•BCCIIn general, though, Pujara was solid, holding India’s innings together with 31 not out in a total of 57 for 3 going into lunch•BCCIPujara found support in Ajinkya Rahane, who struck some pleasing fours of his own•Associated PressThe pair frustrated New Zealand and established some control for India, batting through the middle session to take them to 136 for 3 by tea•BCCIEventually Neil Wagner broke the stand, after they had added 141, getting Pujara to hit to short cover. Patel then got Rohit Sharma cheaply and Rahane soon after•BCCIAs the light faded, Henry took a third, R Ashwin lbw, to help New Zealand nose ahead on a tough day. India ended on 239 for 7•BCCI

An accident that nearly crushed a dream

The former Mumbai captain on his recovery from a traumatic car accident how a spell that caught Dilip Vengsarkar’s eye made the difference

Sairaj Bahutule14-Dec-2016I lost hope of playing cricket after being involved in a tragic car accident in July 1990. I was badly inured, but also lost a friend of mine [Vivek Singh, son of singers Jagjit and Chitra Singh]. I had broken my femur, and had a major fracture on my right leg, and needed to have a steel rod inserted in my leg. I also slipped into coma. It was very, very tough.Somehow I persisted, and my parents’ influence helped me. My father Vasant, who played Ranji Trophy for Maharashtra, kept supporting me and believed I could get back to playing cricket. Recovering physically is one thing, then playing cricket is a different thing. One has to be stronger than normal to overcome such an accident, and that’s where my parents came in to the scene.That situation made me a determined player and a person. Every day I would wake up and just wanted to work extremely hard and achieve something. The steel rod was removed a year after my accident as as it used to hurt my glute area, and then I joined BCA-Mafatlal camp headed by coach Frank Tyson. That was a turning point; that camp was where I got my physical fitness levels high and got stronger.During running and training, my leg used to hurt, but I overcame it. I used to train for about seven hours in a day; we used to have practice in the morning and then later in the evening. In the evening, I used to make the extra effort of going to the gym to get stronger.The turning point was an Under-19 tournament in Mumbai, where I picked up 19 wickets in three matches, including a seven-wicket haul against Maharashtra Under-19s. Dilip Vengsarkar was impressed, and was very headstrong in making me play for the senior Mumbai team straightaway. By that time, I recall I was picked in the India Under-19 squad against New Zealand as well.Shishir Hattangadi was my first captain when I joined the Mumbai senior team. I was in Podar college, and Hattangadi was also from Podar college, so it was comforting to have his presence. His encouragement was very helpful.I was very nervous, and my Ranji Trophy debut didn’t sink in till much later. It was surreal to share the dressing room with the same stalwarts who players of my generation grew up watching. We batted first and made 500-plus runs against Gujarat in Surat. Jatin Paranjpe who was also from Podar college, and Vinod [Kambli] hit hundreds. Jatin was my senior at college, and we practiced a lot together. The Podar nets was the best in Matunga, and we were more than happy to make our debuts together for Mumbai.I knew Vinod from schools cricket. We had played a lot of matches opposite each other. I played for St Xavier’s School, and Vinod and Sachin made that famous 664 partnership against our team in the Harris Shield. Then I played together with Vinod on Under-17 and Under-19 tours; he was a tremendous player.I took four wickets in my first Ranji match, and remember Zubin Bharucha taking a very good catch at mid-off from my bowling. It came off a top edge. Once I got a couple of wickets, I settled down. Gujarat managed to hang on for a draw in the end.When I sit back right now, I will have to say the Ranji debut was a dream come true.To wear the Mumbai cap, the lion on the Mumbai sleeve is an amazing feeling. So many greats have played for Mumbai. Sometimes you wonder whether you really deserve it, but something in me struck Vengsarkar sir.God has been kind to me. After that accident, I had a good first-class career, and went onto play for India too. Now, I am able to help youngsters as a coach. I have no regrets at all. It has been an amazing journey.

A new team, a familiar template

Even with a revamped side, Australia demonstrated they can win the same way many of their predecessors have done in the past: with grit and flair

Daniel Brettig27-Nov-2016Peter Handscomb and Matt Renshaw crossed for the winning runs in their first Test, and a new Australian team won in an old familiar style. For all the talk of debutants and inclusions, the most telling contributions were made by senior players stepping up as they needed to, doubtless inspired by the change they saw around them.More broadly, Australia won in Adelaide because they had more members of their side pitch in at key times than South Africa did. Of the XI chosen by the reconfigured selection panel, only one player – a nervy Nic Maddinson – could not be said to have played a significant part in at least one sequence of the match.Two other players were still to make their presence felt when the fourth day began, but they did so in ways that put the capstone on Australia’s performance. Jackson Bird was chosen narrowly ahead of Chadd Sayers for Adelaide, his extra height and previous successes at Test level allowing his inclusion at the expense of a prolific hometown operator. Bird’s stump-to-stump line is pivotal to his game, and it was one such delivery that pinned Quinton de Kock in front to end the series of a batsman who had been a thorn in Australia’s side. That wicket alone justified Bird’s place.David Warner, too, had some work to do in order to match-up to the efforts of some team-mates. For most of the match he has been afflicted by a shoulder complaint, wincing when throwing and off the field for just long enough in the first innings to be precluded from taking his usual place as an opener. Brushed aside by Kyle Abbott’s seamers when he did get to bat, Warner resumed in the sort of scenario that suits his busy style.Matt Renshaw demonstrated that fluency isn’t the only quality an Australian opener needs•Cricket Australia/Getty ImagesWhile Renshaw covered up judiciously in defence at one end, Warner took the initiative in the kind of manner essential to any chase of a small total. Infamously Australia were stuck in the dust of a fifth day SCG pitch in 1994 to hand South Africa their first Test win down under since readmission, and the early dismissal of the energetic Michael Slater was a critical element to that tale. Warner though was able to capitalise on early errors in line and length from Abbott and Vernon Philander to quickly take down the target.Renshaw was beaten countless times, but his temperament to survive was demonstrated amply even after Warner was wastefully run-out. In many ways, his impact transcended the number of runs he made on debut, for he showed the team and the public that stolid defence can, indeed must, be a part of a successful Australian batting combination in Test matches. His survival of the tricky 12 overs on the first night should not be forgotten, demonstrating supreme judgment around off stump and an unwillingness to do any more than cover the line of the off stump. Across two innings he soaked up 183 balls, a notable figure.This is partly because it shielded the Australian middle order until a platform had been laid, but also partly because Renshaw’s solidity allowed Usman Khawaja to grow into his finest Test innings to date. Avoiding the undue risks posed by driving and keeping out all that South Africa could hurl, he was deservingly Man of the Match. Team-mates, namely Nathan Lyon, had a good natured joke with Khawaja about his newfound “nightwatchman” status, but the truth is that his was an innings with that kind of selflessness at its heart. By departing from his usual methods, Khawaja did exactly the job the team required of him.So too did the captain Steven Smith and the debutant Handscomb. Plenty of times in this series Smith has appeared the batsman best placed to keep South Africa at bay, yet the first innings was his only half-century in the three Tests, and a good one at that. As a captain, most of his field placings and bowling changes had the desired results, not least the use of Nathan Lyon on the third evening.Handscomb’s debut innings was a lovely piece of middle order counter-punching, aided greatly by the hard work done by those above him in the order. His idiosyncratic method was picked apart on the air by the likes of Michael Clarke, with the inference that Handscomb will have to advance further forward from his crease in order to prosper overseas. But the attitude he demonstrated, taking the game to the bowlers and punishing minuscule errors in line and length, contrasted favourably with the inertia offered earlier by Adam Voges, Mitchell Marsh and Peter Nevill, among others.Usman Khawaja struck a selfless match-winning century, an innings that handed Australia the advantage and momentum•Getty ImagesOf the bowlers, Josh Hazlewood and Mitchell Starc enjoyed the movement offered up by the pink ball and a well-grassed Adelaide pitch, while not getting carried away in their search for wickets. Hazlewood has been Australia’s leading wicket-taker for the series, and Starc admirably durable despite what was an abominable physical preparation for Test matches. Both will be better still against Pakistan.So too will be Lyon, author of the spell that tilted the match to the hosts on the third night. He had started the match with three men in the deep for his first over, but grew in confidence with every ball from there. JP Duminy’s dismissal, as important as any in the Test, was brought about partly by tempting the batsman with a gap at midwicket and a second slip, then sliding a quicker ball into off stump. Smith can take credit for floating the idea with Lyon, but so can the bowler for pulling it off. Lyon will sing the team song with plenty of pent-up gusto.Another likely to bellow will be Matthew Wade, a Test match winner on his recall for the first time in more than three years. Wade’s yappy visage behind the stumps has in turn been the cause for plenty of comment, so too his cheap first innings dismissal while Peter Nevill clouted an unbeaten 179 for New South Wales in the Sheffield Shield. But six catches and a stumping were sound reward for a gloveman improved if not perfected, and most of all there was the fact that his winning habit with Victoria has now been returned to Australia.It should not for a moment be forgotten that this was a victory in a dead rubber Test match, of the kind that brought about many false dawns for England in the 1990s. Numerous areas of the game, notably running between the wickets, must be addressed. There also remains the possibility of further evolution for the team between now and the Gabba Test against Pakistan, notably the question of how to re-accommodate Shaun Marsh, perhaps for Maddinson.But the victory in Adelaide has at least provided all with a reminder of how most Test matches have been won by Australian sides over the years, and how they will be again: with grit as well as flair.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus